reference_comparison
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
|
reference_comparison [2015/02/27 10:03] 0.0.0.0 created |
— (current) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== Reference_comparison ====== | ||
| - | ===== Reference comparison: ===== | ||
| - | Brewer #017 and #185 were present at the campaign, calibration of both brewers differs in 0.5%. The Brewer #017 shows temperature dependence during the campaign, if we use the temperature coefficients calculated with the data collected during the campaign the this difference vanishes. As most of the single brewers #017 has a stray light issue underestimating the ozone at high ozone slant path (ozone x air mass). | ||
| - | |||
| - | <br> During the return of brewer #185 to Izaña, the instrument suffer a shock and the slit mask moves from its position, due this accident we can’t guarantee than the instrument was the same before and after the campaign. However, after realignment of the slit the instrument recovers the previous constants so we have some confidence that the instrument did not change. In any case we are pretty sure than the instrument didn't change during the trip to Arosa. | ||
| - | |||
| - | <br> {{wiki:Figure001.png}} | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Figure 1: Reference Comparison Brewer #017 (IOS) vs Brewer #185 (RBCC-E), whit the original configuration (red dotted line) and after de adjustment on #017 of the temperature coefficients (dashed line).** | ||
| - | |||
| - | <br> | ||
reference_comparison.1425031409.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/02/27 10:03 by 0.0.0.0
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
